Midterm betting volume tops $1.48 billion as scrutiny follows concentrated trading
IDN Financials, citing Reuters, says more than 28,000 midterm markets were opened, with trading concentrated in a few Senate races including Texas at nearly 67 million dollars as of October 29. Kalshi reported 1.33 billion dollars across all midterm contracts, while Polymarket's congressional markets drew about 145 million dollars, according to the Anti-Corruption Data Collective.
More than $1.48 billion was wagered on US election prediction markets, according to IDN Financials, citing Reuters. The activity put Kalshi and Polymarket under scrutiny over accuracy and oversight.
Volume centers on a few Senate contests
More than 28,000 midterm markets were opened, according to the reporting. Trading nevertheless clustered in a small number of Senate races, rather than spreading evenly across that range of contracts.
Texas was among the focal points, attracting nearly $67 million as of October 29. That concentration distinguishes the number of markets available from where participants actually committed money.
Platforms report different contract totals
Kalshi reported $1.33 billion across all midterm contracts. Polymarket’s congressional markets attracted about $145 million, according to the Anti-Corruption Data Collective, as cited in the report.
Those figures cover differently described categories: all midterm contracts for Kalshi and congressional markets for Polymarket. The supplied reporting does not provide accuracy measurements or details of the oversight concerns, limiting what can be concluded from the volume figures alone.
What it means for prediction markets
- Breadth is not the same as depth: More than 28,000 markets were opened, but concentrated trading means the headline count does not establish comparable participation across contracts.
- Scope matters in platform comparisons: Kalshi’s all-midterm total and Polymarket’s congressional total should retain their respective labels.
- Volume does not establish accuracy: The reported wagers show substantial participation, but the supplied figures do not demonstrate how reliably market prices anticipated outcomes.
Sources & attribution
- Published
- Source
- IDN Financials
- Publisher
- The publisher did not list a web address.
- Source URL
- The feed did not publish this story's article address.
Full attribution under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. § 512: this article is an original report by Infiniti Intelligence that summarizes the reporting of the publishers named above, links to their original work, and reproduces no protected expression beyond brief factual reference and in-line attribution (“according to IDN Financials”). All rights in the underlying reporting remain with the publishers listed; nothing here implies endorsement by or affiliation with them. Rights holders may request correction, update or removal through the contact address published at infiniti.w3ai.io.
Related
- Ballon d'Or organizer Groupe Amaury files a fraud complaint over Polymarket bets after 12 fresh accounts net about 200,000 dollars, Prediction News reports
- Baltimore Ravens playoff contract priced at 23 cents on Kalshi after the Jacoby Brissett trade, SportsBettingDime reports
- Polymarket says 98.4 percent of popular picks won in its settled midterm markets, with 419 picks correct and 78 markets still pending, Odaily reports
- November 4 volume reaches $5.19B so far across nine venues, with Kalshi accounting for $4.47B of it
- Portland's game contract jumps 26c to 84c against Phoenix on Kalshi, on 800K contracts traded
- Denver's game contract rises 19c to 84c against Toronto on Kalshi, on 1.0M contracts traded