Talos estimate highlights concentrated liquidity in Kalshi’s Senate market
Cointelegraph reports Talos head of research Kelly Ye said that as of 11:30 a.m. ET on Election Day, just 300,000 dollars of selling would have pushed Kalshi's Democrats-win-Senate contract down ten points. The median trade on the midterm markets was around 10 dollars, with a few large-ticket trades making up the majority of the liquidity behind the contracts.
Senate contract’s sensitivity to selling
A relatively modest sell order could have sharply shifted one of Kalshi’s election contracts, according to Cointelegraph’s reporting on an analysis from Talos head of research Kelly Ye.
Ye said that, as of 11:30 a.m. ET on Election Day, $300,000 of selling would have lowered the price of Kalshi’s Democrats-win-Senate contract by ten points. The figure describes an estimated market impact, not a reported sale or an observed price decline.
Small trades, concentrated liquidity
According to Cointelegraph, the median trade across the midterm markets was around $10. A few large-ticket trades accounted for the majority of the liquidity supporting the contracts.
Those figures distinguish typical trade size from the concentration of liquidity. The median describes the middle of the trade-size distribution; it does not establish how much buying or selling a contract could absorb without a substantial price change.
What it means for prediction markets
- Depth matters alongside price: Talos’s estimate suggests the Senate contract was sensitive to concentrated selling at the specified time.
- Price moves need context: A ten-point decline under that scenario would reflect the estimated effect of selling pressure, not necessarily a corresponding change in electoral prospects.
- The snapshot is time-specific: The assessment applies to 11:30 a.m. ET on Election Day and does not establish liquidity conditions before or after that point.
Sources & attribution
- Published
- Source
- Cointelegraphcointelegraph.com
- Publisher
- https://cointelegraph.com
- Source URL
- The feed did not publish this story's article address.
Full attribution under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. § 512: this article is an original report by Infiniti Intelligence that summarizes the reporting of the publishers named above, links to their original work, and reproduces no protected expression beyond brief factual reference and in-line attribution (“according to Cointelegraph”). All rights in the underlying reporting remain with the publishers listed; nothing here implies endorsement by or affiliation with them. Rights holders may request correction, update or removal through the contact address published at infiniti.w3ai.io.
Related
- Kalshi House and Senate control contracts topped 420 million dollars in notional volume as sweep odds stayed stable while stocks fell, Multibagg reports
- Election-night volume is not the same as trader losses, with Kalshi and Polymarket fee math cutting into payouts, SiliconSnark reports
- Hyperliquid HIP-4 outcome markets are far smaller than Polymarket and Kalshi, with no licence and U.S. users barred, Totalis reports
- Study of 358,236 resolved markets finds favourites won 76.9 percent of the time, with Polymarket and Kalshi about equally accurate, PredictDesks reports
- Spain keeps prediction markets inside gambling law, with no dedicated licence category and both Kalshi and Polymarket still blocked
- Kalshi prices a 2026 recession at 6.5%, up 2.5 points in seven days, against 5.5% on Polymarket