Infiniti Feed

US stock perpetuals gain a pathway, with trading halt limits

CryptoPulseDaily reports the CFTC said on November 3 that single-stock perpetual futures could begin trading on eligible regulated exchanges, but the contracts must stop trading whenever the underlying stock is under a regulatory halt. Coinbase's individual product record still showed approval pending when checked on November 4, and securities industry group SIFMA wrote on November 2 seeking further review of the Bitnomial, Coinbase, Kalshi and Nadex proposals.

Single-stock perpetual futures have a route to trading on eligible regulated exchanges in the United States, but that permission comes with a restriction on when traders can exit. According to CryptoPulseDaily, the CFTC said on November 3 that the contracts could begin trading, provided they stop whenever the underlying stock is subject to a regulatory halt.

Permission does not establish every product’s status

The CFTC’s statement does not settle the launch status of every proposed product. CryptoPulseDaily reported that Coinbase’s individual product record continued to show approval pending when checked on November 4.

That distinction matters when assessing whether a specific contract has cleared its remaining hurdles. The reported permission for eligible exchanges and Coinbase’s pending product record are separate pieces of evidence, rather than confirmation that every proposal is ready to trade.

Halt rules and requests for review

The halt requirement also limits trading availability. If a regulatory halt affects the underlying stock, trading in its perpetual futures must stop as well, preventing exits through that contract while the halt applies.

Industry scrutiny preceded the CFTC statement. According to CryptoPulseDaily, securities industry group SIFMA wrote on November 2 requesting further review of proposals from Bitnomial, Coinbase, Kalshi and Nadex.

What it means for prediction markets

  • Separate permission from product approval: Markets tied to a particular launch should distinguish the November 3 CFTC statement from the status of individual proposals, including Coinbase’s pending record on November 4.
  • Account for trading interruptions: The contracts cannot provide an exit during a regulatory halt in the underlying stock.
  • Keep review requests in context: SIFMA’s November 2 letter establishes that it sought further scrutiny; the supplied reporting does not establish the outcome of that request.
KalshiCFTCInfiniti MarketsInfiniti Signals

Sources & attribution

Published
  1. Source
    CryptoPulseDaily
    Publisher
    The publisher did not list a web address.
    Source URL
    The feed did not publish this story's article address.

Full attribution under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. § 512: this article is an original report by Infiniti Intelligence that summarizes the reporting of the publishers named above, links to their original work, and reproduces no protected expression beyond brief factual reference and in-line attribution (“according to CryptoPulseDaily”). All rights in the underlying reporting remain with the publishers listed; nothing here implies endorsement by or affiliation with them. Rights holders may request correction, update or removal through the contact address published at infiniti.w3ai.io.

Related