Green Bay win the Pro Football NFC North Division priced at 7.0% on Kalshi, down 6.0 points, on $899K traded

Green Bay contract moves lower

Green Bay’s contract to win the Pro Football NFC North Division was priced at 7.0% on Kalshi, down 6.0 probability points, with $899K traded, according to the supplied market update published Oct 25, 2026 · 10:54 PM ET.

According to PredictionBubbles, the contract appeared among declining sports markets on its movers board. That placement identifies a downward repricing within sports, rather than the board’s overall leading move. The supplied material does not identify a cause for the decline.

How the board measures movement

PredictionBubbles ranks contracts by the size of their probability-point changes over 24 hours, rather than their relative percentage changes. Trading volume and liquidity provide context but do not affect the ranking. The Green Bay decline therefore represents a 6.0-point adjustment, not a 6.0% relative fall.

The board draws prices from Polymarket and Kalshi and updates every 15 minutes. The supplied page records a venue-data snapshot of 26 Oct 2026, 02:36 UTC. Its ranking covers 1,995 markets lasting longer than 14 days, excluding short-lived fixtures that could otherwise dominate as settlement approaches.

Only open contracts with a valid 24-hour comparison qualify. At the supplied snapshot, the main table displayed the top 150 of 543 markets that had moved at least one probability point, according to PredictionBubbles.

The $899K traded figure adds activity context to Green Bay’s price change, but the supplied contract details do not establish order-book depth or explain what prompted traders to mark down its divisional prospects.

What it means for prediction markets

• Price and movement are distinct: The 7.0% reading is the contract’s reported market-implied probability; the 6.0-point decline describes its change over the board’s 24-hour window.
• Volume does not establish liquidity: The reported $899K traded does not, by itself, show how much trading could occur without moving the price.
• The catalyst remains unspecified: The material documents repricing, but provides no basis for attributing it to a particular sporting development.
• Rankings depend on scope: This is a downward sports move on a board that excludes short-lived fixtures, not necessarily the largest change across all available contracts.