Sam Houston wins priced at 18.0% on Kalshi, down 17.0 points, on $1.2M traded

The Sam Houston win contract on Kalshi was priced at 18.0%, down 17.0 probability points, with $1.2M traded, according to PredictionBubbles’ movers-board summary. The contract was among the board’s largest downward moves in sports.

The supplied summary describes the board as unchanged at its Oct. 28, 02:13 UTC reading. The accompanying source page carries a later venue-data timestamp of 28 Oct 2026, 03:14 UTC, but its supplied text does not include the Sam Houston contract’s individual listing.

How the move is measured

According to PredictionBubbles, the board compares market-implied probabilities over 24 hours, refreshing venue prices every 15 minutes. Rankings reflect the size of the change in probability points, rather than the relative percentage change. Sam Houston’s reported decline is therefore a 17.0-point move, not a 17.0% decline.

The board covers Polymarket and Kalshi and ranks 2,023 markets with lifespans longer than 14 days. It excludes same-week fixtures and requires open markets to have a valid 24-hour comparison. Its displayed table contains the top 150 of 495 markets moving by at least one probability point.

What the data does not establish

The supplied material does not identify the opponent, event date, settlement conditions or a catalyst for Sam Houston’s repricing. It therefore supports a report on the contract’s price movement, but not an explanation of why traders marked down its chances.

PredictionBubbles treats trading volume as context rather than a ranking input. The $1.2M figure accompanies the reported move, but does not by itself establish market depth or explain the decline.

What it means for prediction markets

• Price and outcome are distinct: The 18.0% reading reflects the contract’s market-implied probability, not a confirmed result.
• The ranking measures movement: The 17.0-point decline determines its position among movers; traded volume does not alter that ranking.
• Contract details remain essential: Without the event and settlement terms, the supplied figures cannot support a more specific assessment of the repricing.