Sports contract disputes expand as Supreme Court petitions await action
DeFi Rate's litigation tracker puts the fight over sports event contracts at 134 lawsuits and 14 administrative or enforcement actions, with Supreme Court petitions filed by New Jersey, Robinhood and reportedly Crypto.com's exchange and none granted yet. The next hearing listed is First Circuit oral argument in the Massachusetts case on November 4.
The legal contest over sports event contracts has reached 134 lawsuits and 14 administrative or enforcement actions across 29 states and Washington, DC, according to DeFi Rate’s litigation tracker.
Those totals distinguish court cases from administrative and enforcement proceedings, showing that the dispute is unfolding through multiple legal channels.
Supreme Court petitions remain pending
According to DeFi Rate, New Jersey and Robinhood have filed Supreme Court petitions. Crypto.com's exchange has reportedly filed a petition as well. None has been granted yet.
The petitions therefore remain separate from any decision by the Supreme Court to take up the disputes. The tracker’s count does not establish how those requests will be resolved.
Massachusetts argument is next on the calendar
The next hearing listed by DeFi Rate is First Circuit oral argument in the Massachusetts case on November 4. The summary provides no outcome from that proceeding.
What it means for prediction markets
- Litigation spans several channels: The 134 lawsuits and 14 administrative or enforcement actions are distinct categories, not a single count of court cases.
- Supreme Court review is not secured: Petitions from New Jersey, Robinhood and reportedly Crypto.com's exchange have not yet been granted.
- The immediate procedural focus is Massachusetts: The November 4 First Circuit oral argument is the next listed hearing, not a reported ruling on sports event contracts.
Sources & attribution
- Published
- Source
- DeFi Ratedefirate.com
- Publisher
- https://defirate.com
- Source URL
- The feed did not publish this story's article address.
Full attribution under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. § 512: this article is an original report by Infiniti Intelligence that summarizes the reporting of the publishers named above, links to their original work, and reproduces no protected expression beyond brief factual reference and in-line attribution (“according to DeFi Rate”). All rights in the underlying reporting remain with the publishers listed; nothing here implies endorsement by or affiliation with them. Rights holders may request correction, update or removal through the contact address published at infiniti.w3ai.io.
Related
- Appeals courts split over whether sports event contracts are swaps, putting prediction market regulation on a road to the Supreme Court, Foley and Lardner reports
- Prediction market litigation is split across three appeals courts, with the Third Circuit backing Kalshi against New Jersey while the Ninth and Sixth Circuits side with the states, Foley and Lardner reports