Ole Miss win the College Football Playoff National Championship priced at 2.0% on Kalshi, down 3.0 points, on $6.3M traded
PredictionBubbles lists the Ole Miss title contract among its downward sports moves, in a sports markets category distinct from the lead. It has zero hits in any Oct. 25…
Full attribution under the DMCA, 17 U.S.C. § 512: an original Infiniti Intelligence report summarizing and linking to the publishers named above. All rights in the underlying reporting remain with them. Rights holders may request correction or removal via the contact address at infiniti.w3ai.io.
The Kalshi contract on Ole Miss winning the College Football Playoff National Championship was priced at 2.0%, down 3.0 probability points over 24 hours, with $6.3M traded, according to the supplied market update published Oct 25, 2026, at 9:54 AM ET.
PredictionBubbles placed the contract among declining sports markets, separate from the page’s lead mover. The supplied material does not identify a game result, team announcement or other specific catalyst for the repricing.
How the move is measured
According to PredictionBubbles, its movers page compares prices from Kalshi and Polymarket over 24 hours and updates every 15 minutes. The supplied snapshot records venue data read on 25 Oct 2026, 13:41 UTC.
The page ranks changes by probability points rather than relative percentages. Trading volume and liquidity provide context but do not determine the rankings. Its stated universe covers 2,006 markets lasting longer than 14 days, excluding same-week fixtures and markets without a valid 24-hour comparison.
The $6.3M traded figure accompanies the Ole Miss price update, but the supplied headline does not specify its measurement period. It should therefore not be treated as confirmed 24-hour turnover or as a measure of the liquidity available at the current price.
What it means for prediction markets
A lower market assessment: The 2.0% price and 3.0-point decline show a reduced market-implied chance of an Ole Miss title over the comparison window.
No established catalyst: The available material documents the price change, not why traders changed their assessment.
Volume needs context: The reported $6.3M traded does not establish how much activity occurred during the decline or how deep the market is now.