More tech layoffs in 2026 than in 2025 priced at 94.1% on Kalshi, down 0.5 points, on $31.5M traded
No significant new platform headline in the last 30 minutes; news search recirculated only items already used today, taken by website-only batches, or on the banned list…
Full attribution under the DMCA, 17 U.S.C. § 512: an original Infiniti Intelligence report summarizing and linking to the publishers named above. All rights in the underlying reporting remain with them. Rights holders may request correction or removal via the contact address at infiniti.w3ai.io.
Kalshi’s market on whether tech layoffs in 2026 will exceed those in 2025 was priced at 94.1%, down 0.5 percentage points over 24 hours, in the Oct 28, 2026, 8:09 AM ET snapshot. Total traded volume stood at $31.5M.
A high probability, with a modest retreat
According to predictionbubbles.net, the contract was the most heavily traded market on its board for questions outside its main categories at the latest refresh. The price continued to imply a strong expectation of more tech layoffs in 2026 than in 2025, despite the small decline.
The supplied news-search summary identified no significant new platform headline in the preceding 30 minutes. It therefore offers no fresh reporting that explains the price movement or independently establishes the underlying layoff trend.
Reading the snapshot
According to predictionbubbles.net, its board covered 25 markets in this category: 23 from Kalshi and 2 from Polymarket. The site refreshes its data every 15 minutes, while trading on the venues continues between updates.
The site defines volume as total trading reported by the venue, rather than trading during the latest 24-hour period. Its volume ranking is also separate from its ranking by absolute probability movement, so the contract’s leading turnover does not mean it recorded the largest price change.
What it means for prediction markets
Strong expectations, not certainty: The 94.1% price represents the market-implied probability of “Yes,” not a confirmed comparison of annual layoffs.
Limited evidence of a catalyst: The 0.5-point decline is observable, but the supplied material does not establish what caused it.
Volume and timing matter: The $31.5M figure is cumulative reported turnover, and a 15-minute data refresh can lag ongoing trading.
Resolution details remain important: The supplied material does not specify the contract’s layoff-counting methodology or settlement criteria, limiting interpretation beyond the stated question.