Jacksonville St. wins priced at 99.0% on Kalshi, up 40.0 points, on $964K traded

Jacksonville St. was priced at 99.0% to win on Kalshi, a rise of 40.0 probability points, with $964K traded, according to the supplied headline accompanying PredictionBubbles’ movers-board summary. The figures describe a sharp repricing, not confirmation of a result.

A snapshot with limits

The summary identifies a crawl and data read at Oct. 29, 02:46 UTC, covering 1,974 ranked markets, with 520 moving at least 1 point in 24 hours. The headline was published Oct 28, 2026 · 11:39 PM ET.

The supplied PredictionBubbles page reflects a different snapshot: venue data read on 29 Oct 2026, 03:46 UTC, with 1,989 markets ranked and 513 meeting the movement threshold. Its table displays the top 150 movers. Those counts should not be combined with the earlier summary as though they represent one observation.

The page excerpt does not include the Jacksonville St. market’s individual listing, opponent, settlement terms or a catalyst for the move. It therefore provides methodology and broader market context, but does not independently substantiate the headline’s contract-level figures.

How the board measures movement

According to PredictionBubbles, its rankings use the absolute change in implied probability over 24 hours, rather than relative percentage changes. Prices come from Polymarket and Kalshi, and the board updates every 15 minutes. Trading volume and liquidity provide context but do not determine rank.

The board covers markets lasting longer than 14 days and excludes short-lived same-week fixtures. It also leaves out resolved markets and contracts without a valid 24-hour comparison. These filters matter when interpreting a sports-related move: the supplied material does not establish precisely what the Jacksonville St. contract asks or when it settles.

What it means for prediction markets

• The change is 40.0 probability points, not 40.0%. The headline reports a substantial shift toward a Jacksonville St. win.
• 99.0% is a market price, not a verified outcome. The excerpt supplies neither a result nor settlement confirmation.
• $964K traded adds context, but does not establish liquidity. The supplied material does not specify the volume window for that figure or show order-book depth.
• Snapshot timing matters. The earlier summary and later page contain different market counts; neither should be used to fill gaps in the missing individual listing.