Google blocks prediction-market ads in a fifth state, with Connecticut the latest addition
Quiet quarter-hour — no significant new platform headline in the last 15 minutes, so this fresh advertising restriction leads, in a legal/regulatory category different…
Google has added Connecticut to the states where prediction-market operators cannot target users through Google Ads, bringing the total to five, according to defirate.com. The restriction took effect last week and applies even to operators that meet federal regulatory requirements.
Connecticut joins Michigan, Nevada, New York and Ohio. The exclusions have accumulated over several months: Nevada was already off-limits when Google opened its advertising program to eligible prediction-market businesses in January.
Advertising access remains conditional
Google began permitting eligible prediction-market advertising on Jan. 21, with certification required. The framework covers Commodity Futures Trading Commission-authorized designated contract markets primarily engaged in listing event contracts, as well as qualifying National Futures Association-authorized brokerages that offer access to those exchanges. Advertisers still need Google’s approval, must follow applicable laws and may target only eligible locations.
The Connecticut notice covers prediction-market contracts and associated products without singling out companies or restricting its scope to sports, according to defirate.com. It governs Google Ads targeting—not whether Connecticut residents may trade, whether operators may use other promotional channels or whether their websites appear in Google Search.
State enforcement adds pressure
Connecticut regulators issued cease-and-desist orders to nine prediction market platforms in September, alongside nearly 30 subpoenas directed at gaming service providers and media companies, including Google. Google’s notice gives no reason for the new exclusion, so the sequence does not establish that the subpoenas caused its decision.
Michigan’s enforcement dispute illustrates the stakes around marketing. This week, the state asked a judge to hold Kalshi in contempt, alleging that residents continued receiving sports-related promotional emails and targeted advertisements despite a Sept. 1 injunction barring sports event contracts and their marketing. A Nov. 24 hearing will consider whether Kalshi breached that order.
Michigan and Nevada have obtained restrictions on sports event trading as states contest operators’ arguments that federal commodities oversight supersedes state gambling law. Google’s policy does not resolve that dispute, but it limits an avenue for customer acquisition while the litigation proceeds.
What it means for prediction markets
- Federal authorization does not ensure advertising access. Google’s certification requirements and state exclusions operate as separate conditions.
- The Connecticut change is broader than sports advertising. Its stated scope encompasses prediction-market contracts and related products.
- Advertising limits and trading restrictions are distinct. The Google Ads change is not itself a judicial determination about residents’ ability to trade.
- Nov. 24 is a marketing-enforcement date to watch. The Michigan hearing will address allegations that Kalshi violated the Sept. 1 order, not an established finding of contempt.
- Defirate (defirate.com)https://defirate.com/news/google-blocks-prediction-market-ads-connecticut/