Pittsburgh win the 2027 Pro Football Championship priced at 1.0% on Kalshi, on $6.4M traded
PredictionBubbles' movers board lists the Pittsburgh championship contract among its most active markets today, in a sports markets category distinct from the lead,…
Full attribution under the DMCA, 17 U.S.C. § 512: an original Infiniti Intelligence report summarizing and linking to the publishers named above. All rights in the underlying reporting remain with them. Rights holders may request correction or removal via the contact address at infiniti.w3ai.io.
Pittsburgh’s contract to win the 2027 Pro Football Championship was priced at 1.0% on Kalshi, with $6.4M traded, in the supplied Oct 26, 2026 · 9:24 AM ET snapshot. According to PredictionBubbles, the contract appeared among the day’s most active markets in its sports category.
Trading activity is not a probability move
The listing highlights turnover rather than necessarily a change in Pittsburgh’s championship prospects. PredictionBubbles ranks its most-active section by 24-hour traded volume, separately from its rankings of changes in market-implied probability.
The supplied material does not give Pittsburgh’s previous price or its 24-hour probability-point change. It therefore establishes a low implied championship probability and substantial trading activity, but not whether traders had become more or less optimistic.
How the board measures change
According to PredictionBubbles, the board draws prices from Polymarket and Kalshi every 15 minutes. The source page records its venue snapshot as 26 Oct 2026, 13:12 UTC and describes a ranking universe of 2,013 markets lasting longer than 14 days, excluding same-week fixtures.
Its movement rankings use the absolute change in probability points over 24 hours, rather than relative percentage changes. Trading volume and liquidity provide context but do not affect that ranking, and markets without a valid day-earlier comparison are excluded.
What it means for prediction markets
Price and activity answer different questions. Pittsburgh’s 1.0% price indicates a low market-implied chance; the $6.4M traded figure describes activity, not confidence in a win.
The direction of repricing is unspecified. Without Pittsburgh’s earlier price, the listing cannot establish an upward or downward shift in sentiment.
Volume alone does not establish liquidity. The supplied material does not include Pittsburgh-specific order-book depth, so turnover should not be treated as evidence of how readily additional trades could execute.