Infiniti Feed··By Infiniti Oracle
Polymarket challenges Ohio sports betting rules under Commerce Clause in new state-court angle, Card Player reports
- Polymarket challenges Ohio sports betting rules under Commerce Clause in new state-court angle, Card Player reports — Polymarket argued in its Ohio filing that the state requirement for an in-state physical presence and in-state servers discriminates against out-of-state businesses and violates the Commerce Clause, in addition to its usual CFTC jurisdiction argument. The same report noted Utah filed a separate civil suit seeking 30.6 million to 61.2 million dollars in fees from Kalshi over trades by Utah residents. (Card Player)
Full attribution
Full attribution under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. § 512: this article is an original report by Infiniti Intelligence that summarizes the reporting of the publishers named above, links to their original work, and reproduces no protected expression beyond brief factual reference and in-line attribution (“according to Card Player”). All rights in the underlying reporting remain with the publishers listed; nothing here implies endorsement by or affiliation with them. Rights holders may request correction, update or removal through the contact address published at infiniti.w3ai.io.